County drinking water records

Grant County, WI drinking water systems

25 community water systems serve Grant County, WI, reporting 33,999 people served in all. A system that also serves other counties counts all of its customers here.

13 of them (52%) had at least one health-based violation in the last 10 years. 10 systems still have one unresolved.

25 rely mainly on groundwater, counting water bought from other systems.

Their lead service line inventories list 25 lead lines, 81 galvanized lines that must be replaced and 3,740 lines of unknown material.

3 more systems are placed in Grant County, WI by the county their records name because they have no service area map that lines up with their own records, so they are listed apart and not counted here.

Community water systems
25
People served, sum of each system's own figure
33,999
Systems with a health-based violation, last 10 years
13
Systems with one unresolved
10
Lead service lines in inventories
25

Water systems serving Grant County

25 systems

People served is each system's own figure for its whole service area. Violation counts cover the last 10 years of EPA records.

System Serves People served Main source Health-based violations, 10 years Unresolved Lead lines
Platteville Waterworks Platteville 12,268 Groundwater 0 0 13
Lancaster Waterworks Lancaster 3,907 Groundwater 0 0 2
Boscobel Waterworks Boscobel 3,237 Groundwater 0 0 2
Fennimore Waterworks Fennimore 2,507 Groundwater 0 1 0
Cuba City Waterworks Cuba City 2,141 Groundwater 1 1 0
Muscoda Waterworks Muscoda 1,453 Groundwater 0 0 0
Hazel Green Waterworks Hazel Green 1,193 Groundwater 2 1 0
Dickeyville Waterworks Dickeyville 1,069 Groundwater 0 0 0
Cassville Waterworks Cassville 777 Groundwater 1 1 2
Montfort Waterworks Montfort 718 Groundwater 2 3 4
Potosi Waterworks Potosi 718 Groundwater 2 0 2
Bloomington Waterworks Bloomington 682 Groundwater 0 0 0
Livingston Waterworks Livingston 664 Groundwater 0 0 0
Kieler SD No 1 Kieler 560 Groundwater 1 1 0
Blue River Waterworks Blue River 424 Groundwater 0 1 0
Tennyson Waterworks Tennyson and Potosi 367 Groundwater 2 0 0
Bagley Waterworks Bagley 353 Groundwater 1 0 0
Sinsinawa Dominicans Inc Outside cities and towns 213 Groundwater 0 0 0
Mount Hope Waterworks Mount Hope 181 Groundwater 1 0 0
Patch Grove Waterworks Patch Grove 160 Groundwater 0 0 0
Stitzer Sanitary Dist 1 Outside cities and towns 150 Groundwater 2 3 0
Maryville SD 2 Hazel Green and land outside it 100 Groundwater 1 1 0
Cozy Acres MHP Boscobel and land outside it 80 Groundwater 0 0 0
Bluffside Court Cassville and land outside it 40 Groundwater 1 2 0
Stateline Mobile Home Park Hazel Green and land outside it 37 Groundwater 2 0 0

Systems placed by county record in Grant County

3 systems

EPA has no service area map for these systems. They are placed by the county their records name (the counties EPA lists them serving, or the county coded in their IDs where EPA lists none), and without a map they are not counted in the figures above.

System Serves People served Main source Health-based violations, 10 years Unresolved Lead lines
Oak Park Community County on record 90 Groundwater 2 3 0
Patriot Park County on record 80 Groundwater 0 0 0
River Vista Estates LLC County on record 30 Groundwater 0 0 0

Cities and towns in Grant County

19 places

Back to Wisconsin

Counties come from the counties EPA lists each system serving, matched to 2024 Census counties; where EPA lists none, from the county coded in the system's ID, its service area map, or its mailing address. A county holding at least a fifth of a system's service area map is added when at least a fifth of that map lies in those counties. Towns are the ones EPA lists and the Census places such a map covers, always inside those counties. In New England, where EPA's town names a whole Town, it is not matched to the village of the same name. A system is not listed in a county holding less than a fifth of its map, or in a county or town its map reaches when the map lies mostly outside the counties EPA lists, so a page can leave out a system that serves part of the area. Methodology and limitations