County drinking water records

Davis County, UT drinking water systems

20 community water systems serve Davis County, UT, reporting 417,148 people served in all. A system that also serves other counties counts all of its customers here.

6 of them (30%) had at least one health-based violation in the last 10 years. 1 system still has one unresolved.

2 rely mainly on groundwater and 18 on surface water, counting water bought from other systems.

Their lead service line inventories list 0 lead lines, 86 galvanized lines that must be replaced and 7,475 lines of unknown material.

1 more system is placed in Davis County, UT by the county its records name because it has no service area map that lines up with its own records, so it is listed apart and not counted here.

Community water systems
20
People served, sum of each system's own figure
417,148
Systems with a health-based violation, last 10 years
6
Systems with one unresolved
1
Lead service lines in inventories
0

Water systems serving Davis County

20 systems

People served is each system's own figure for its whole service area. Violation counts cover the last 10 years of EPA records.

System Serves People served Main source Health-based violations, 10 years Unresolved Lead lines
Layton City Water System Layton 82,000 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
Bountiful City Water System Bountiful 37,500 Surface water 1 0 0
Syracuse City Water System Syracuse 35,561 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
Clearfield City Water System Clearfield 33,540 Purchased surface water 3 0 0
Kaysville City Water System Kaysville 32,976 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
Farmington City Water System Farmington 27,860 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
Hill Air Force Base Sunset and land outside it 25,625 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
Clinton City Water System Clinton 23,000 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
Hooper Water Improvement District Hooper, West Point and 1 more 20,820 Groundwater 1 0 0
North Salt Lake City Water System North Salt Lake 18,655 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
Centerville City Water System Centerville 17,155 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
Woods Cross City Water System Woods Cross 13,110 Groundwater 0 0 0
South Davis Water District Bountiful and North Salt Lake 10,565 Purchased surface water 2 0 0
West Point City Water System West Point 9,686 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
South Weber Water System South Weber 8,125 Purchased surface water 1 0 0
Fruit Heights City Water System Fruit Heights 6,075 Purchased surface water 1 0 0
West Bountiful City Water System West Bountiful 5,600 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
Sunset City Water System Sunset 5,300 Purchased surface water 0 2 0
Boyer Hill Military Housing Clearfield 3,300 Purchased surface water 0 0 0
Mutton Hollow Improvement District Outside cities and towns 695 Purchased surface water 0 0 0

Systems placed by county record in Davis County

1 system

EPA has no service area map for this system. It is placed by the county its records name (the counties EPA lists it serving, or the county coded in its ID where EPA lists none), and without a map it is not counted in the figures above.

System Serves People served Main source Health-based violations, 10 years Unresolved Lead lines
Weber Basin WCD - South County on record Not reported Surface water 0 0 0

Cities and towns in Davis County

15 places

Back to Utah

Counties come from the counties EPA lists each system serving, matched to 2024 Census counties; where EPA lists none, from the county coded in the system's ID, its service area map, or its mailing address. A county holding at least a fifth of a system's service area map is added when at least a fifth of that map lies in those counties. Towns are the ones EPA lists and the Census places such a map covers, always inside those counties. In New England, where EPA's town names a whole Town, it is not matched to the village of the same name. A system is not listed in a county holding less than a fifth of its map, or in a county or town its map reaches when the map lies mostly outside the counties EPA lists, so a page can leave out a system that serves part of the area. Methodology and limitations