County drinking water records
Cache County, UT drinking water systems
25 community water systems serve Cache County, UT, reporting 126,406 people served in all. A system that also serves other counties counts all of its customers here.
12 of them (48%) had at least one health-based violation in the last 10 years. 7 systems still have one unresolved.
24 rely mainly on groundwater and 1 on surface water, counting water bought from other systems.
Their lead service line inventories list 0 lead lines, 0 galvanized lines that must be replaced and 4,241 lines of unknown material.
- Community water systems
- 25
- People served, sum of each system's own figure
- 126,406
- Systems with a health-based violation, last 10 years
- 12
- Systems with one unresolved
- 7
- Lead service lines in inventories
- 0
Water systems serving Cache County
25 systemsPeople served is each system's own figure for its whole service area. Violation counts cover the last 10 years of EPA records.
| System | Serves | People served | Main source | Health-based violations, 10 years | Unresolved | Lead lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logan City Water System | Logan | 55,540 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Smithfield City | Smithfield | 10,223 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyrum City | Hyrum | 10,200 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Providence City Water System | Providence | 8,830 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North Logan City | North Logan | 8,500 | Surface water | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Nibley City Water | Nibley | 7,926 | Groundwater | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Hyde Park City Water System | Hyde Park | 5,200 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wellsville City Water System | Wellsville | 4,190 | Groundwater | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Richmond City Water System | Richmond | 2,967 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| River Heights City | River Heights | 2,195 | Groundwater | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Lewiston City | Lewiston | 2,078 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Millville City | Millville | 1,900 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mendon City | Mendon | 1,640 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paradise Town Water System | Paradise | 1,014 | Groundwater | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Newton Town Water System | Newton | 810 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Clarkston Town Water System | Clarkston | 763 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Benson Culinary Improvement District | Benson | 743 | Groundwater | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Amalga Town Water System | Amalga | 495 | Groundwater | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Trenton Town Water System | Trenton | 490 | Groundwater | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Cornish Town Water System | Cornish | 275 | Groundwater | 5 | 2 | 0 |
| Willow Creek Water Co | Peter | 175 | Groundwater | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| High Creek Water Co | Cove | 120 | Groundwater | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Cove Waterworks | Cove | 60 | Groundwater | 7 | 2 | 0 |
| Goaslind Spring W W Co | Cove | 45 | Groundwater | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Paradise West Subdivision | Outside cities and towns | 27 | Groundwater | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Cities and towns in Cache County
22 places- Amalga1 system
- Benson1 system
- Clarkston1 system
- Cornish1 system
- Cove3 systems
- Hyde Park1 system
- Hyrum1 system
- Lewiston1 system
- Logan1 system
- Mendon1 system
- Millville1 system
- Newton1 system
- Nibley1 system
- North Logan1 system
- Paradise1 system
- Peter1 system
- Providence1 system
- Richmond1 system
- River Heights1 system
- Smithfield1 system
- Trenton1 system
- Wellsville1 system
Counties come from the counties EPA lists each system serving, matched to 2024 Census counties; where EPA lists none, from the county coded in the system's ID, its service area map, or its mailing address. A county holding at least a fifth of a system's service area map is added when at least a fifth of that map lies in those counties. Towns are the ones EPA lists and the Census places such a map covers, always inside those counties. In New England, where EPA's town names a whole Town, it is not matched to the village of the same name. A system is not listed in a county holding less than a fifth of its map, or in a county or town its map reaches when the map lies mostly outside the counties EPA lists, so a page can leave out a system that serves part of the area. Methodology and limitations