County drinking water records
Logan County, OK drinking water systems
15 community water systems serve Logan County, OK, reporting 32,687 people served in all. A system that also serves other counties counts all of its customers here.
8 of them (53%) had at least one health-based violation in the last 10 years. 5 systems still have one unresolved.
11 rely mainly on groundwater and 4 on surface water, counting water bought from other systems.
14 systems filed a lead service line inventory listing 0 lead lines, 0 galvanized lines that must be replaced and 6,765 lines of unknown material.
1 more system is placed in Logan County, OK by the county its records name because it has no service area map that lines up with its own records, so it is listed apart and not counted here.
- Community water systems
- 15
- People served, sum of each system's own figure
- 32,687
- Systems with a health-based violation, last 10 years
- 8
- Systems with one unresolved
- 5
- Lead service lines in inventories
- 0
Water systems serving Logan County
15 systemsPeople served is each system's own figure for its whole service area. Violation counts cover the last 10 years of EPA records.
| System | Serves | People served | Main source | Health-based violations, 10 years | Unresolved | Lead lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guthrie | Guthrie and Cedar Valley | 9,925 | Surface water | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Logan Co RWD #1 | Guthrie and Seward and land outside them | 8,907 | Purchased surface water | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Deer Creek Rural Water Corp | Oklahoma City and land outside it | 5,500 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Langston PWA | Langston | 1,670 | Surface water | 11 | 2 | 0 |
| Logan Co RWS & SWMD #3 | Orlando and Lovell and land outside them | 1,618 | Groundwater | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Crescent | Crescent and land outside it | 1,411 | Groundwater | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Logan Co RWD #2 | Cimarron City, Cedar Valley and 2 more and land outside them | 1,146 | Groundwater | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Cashion | Cashion | 900 | Purchased groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Whispering Oaks | Outside cities and towns | 350 | Groundwater | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Coyle | Coyle | 289 | Purchased surface water | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Marshall | Marshall | 258 | Purchased groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mulhall | Outside cities and towns | 225 | Purchased groundwater | 1 | 3 | No inventory |
| Orlando | Orlando | 201 | Purchased groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Blue Quail Logan County | Outside cities and towns | 188 | Groundwater | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Peppers Ranch | Outside cities and towns | 99 | Groundwater | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Systems placed by county record in Logan County
1 systemEPA has no service area map for this system. It is placed by the county its records name (the counties EPA lists it serving, or the county coded in its ID where EPA lists none), and without a map it is not counted in the figures above.
| System | Serves | People served | Main source | Health-based violations, 10 years | Unresolved | Lead lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rock Creek | County on record | 33 | Groundwater | 2 | 10 | No inventory |
Cities and towns in Logan County
11 places- Cedar Valley2 systems
- Cimarron City2 systems
- Coyle1 system
- Crescent1 system
- Crescent Springs1 system
- Guthrie2 systems
- Langston1 system
- Lovell1 system
- Marshall1 system
- Orlando2 systems
- Seward1 system
Counties come from the counties EPA lists each system serving, matched to 2024 Census counties; where EPA lists none, from the county coded in the system's ID, its service area map, or its mailing address. A county holding at least a fifth of a system's service area map is added when at least a fifth of that map lies in those counties. Towns are the ones EPA lists and the Census places such a map covers, always inside those counties. In New England, where EPA's town names a whole Town, it is not matched to the village of the same name. A system is not listed in a county holding less than a fifth of its map, or in a county or town its map reaches when the map lies mostly outside the counties EPA lists, so a page can leave out a system that serves part of the area. Methodology and limitations