County drinking water records
Garfield County, OK drinking water systems
19 community water systems serve Garfield County, OK, reporting 58,923 people served in all. A system that also serves other counties counts all of its customers here.
10 of them (53%) had at least one health-based violation in the last 10 years. 8 systems still have one unresolved.
19 rely mainly on groundwater, counting water bought from other systems.
15 systems filed a lead service line inventory listing 0 lead lines, 56 galvanized lines that must be replaced and 14,299 lines of unknown material.
2 more systems are placed in Garfield County, OK by the county their records name because they have no service area map that lines up with their own records, so they are listed apart and not counted here.
- Community water systems
- 19
- People served, sum of each system's own figure
- 58,923
- Systems with a health-based violation, last 10 years
- 10
- Systems with one unresolved
- 8
- Lead service lines in inventories
- 0
Water systems serving Garfield County
19 systemsPeople served is each system's own figure for its whole service area. Violation counts cover the last 10 years of EPA records.
| System | Serves | People served | Main source | Health-based violations, 10 years | Unresolved | Lead lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enid | Enid, North Enid and 1 more and land outside them | 49,347 | Groundwater | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Garfield Co RWD #5 | Enid, Waukomis and 1 more and land outside them | 1,980 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Waukomis PWA | Outside cities and towns | 1,366 | Groundwater | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Garfield Co RWD #6 | Fairmont and Hunter and land outside them | 1,225 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Garber Municipal Authority | Garber | 725 | Purchased groundwater | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Highpoint MHP | Enid | 600 | Groundwater | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Lahoma PWA | Enid and Lahoma and land outside them | 577 | Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Covington | Covington and land outside it | 553 | Purchased groundwater | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Drummond | Drummond | 405 | Purchased groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Garfield Co RWD # 4 | Outside cities and towns | 334 | Purchased groundwater | 1 | 4 | No inventory |
| Kremlin-Hillsdale Rural Water District 1 | Breckenridge and Kremlin and land outside them | 320 | Groundwater | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Kremlin | Kremlin | 300 | Purchased groundwater | 1 | 0 | No inventory |
| Hunter | Outside cities and towns | 300 | Purchased groundwater | 1 | 1 | No inventory |
| Garfield Co RWD #7 | Outside cities and towns | 288 | Purchased groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Breckinridge PWA | Breckenridge | 239 | Groundwater | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Fairmont | Outside cities and towns | 147 | Purchased groundwater | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Hillsdale PWA | Hillsdale | 110 | Purchased groundwater | 1 | 2 | No inventory |
| Chisholm Creek Housing Addition | North Enid | 75 | Purchased groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Douglas | Douglas | 32 | Purchased groundwater | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Systems placed by county record in Garfield County
2 systemsEPA has no service area map for these systems. They are placed by the county their records name (the counties EPA lists them serving, or the county coded in their IDs where EPA lists none), and without a map they are not counted in the figures above.
| System | Serves | People served | Main source | Health-based violations, 10 years | Unresolved | Lead lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vance AFB | County on record | 3,231 | Purchased groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Salt Fork Water Authority | County on record | 86 | Purchased groundwater | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Cities and towns in Garfield County
15 placesCounties come from the counties EPA lists each system serving, matched to 2024 Census counties; where EPA lists none, from the county coded in the system's ID, its service area map, or its mailing address. A county holding at least a fifth of a system's service area map is added when at least a fifth of that map lies in those counties. Towns are the ones EPA lists and the Census places such a map covers, always inside those counties. In New England, where EPA's town names a whole Town, it is not matched to the village of the same name. A system is not listed in a county holding less than a fifth of its map, or in a county or town its map reaches when the map lies mostly outside the counties EPA lists, so a page can leave out a system that serves part of the area. Methodology and limitations