City and town drinking water records
Water systems serving East Grand Rapids, MI
2 community water systems have a mapped service area in East Grand Rapids, MI. Grand Rapids covers 100% of the area inside East Grand Rapids's Census boundary and reports serving 306,901 people in all.
None of them had a health-based violation in the last 10 years.
2 rely mainly on surface water, counting water bought from other systems.
Their lead service line inventories list 19,805 lead lines, 58 galvanized lines that must be replaced and 1,679 lines of unknown material.
- Community water systems
- 2
- Systems with a health-based violation, last 10 years
- 0
- Systems with one unresolved
- 0
- Lead service lines in inventories
- 19,805
Water systems serving East Grand Rapids
2 systemsPeople served is each system's own figure for its whole service area. Violation counts cover the last 10 years of EPA records.
| System | Area | People served | Main source | Health-based violations, 10 years | Unresolved | Lead lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Rapids | Covers 100% of East Grand Rapids | 306,901 | Surface water | 0 | 0 | 19,430 |
| East Grand Rapids | Covers 42% of East Grand Rapids | 11,637 | Purchased surface water | 0 | 0 | 375 |
Other cities and towns in Kent County
18 placesCounties come from the counties EPA lists each system serving, matched to 2024 Census counties; where EPA lists none, from the county coded in the system's ID, its service area map, or its mailing address. A county holding at least a fifth of a system's service area map is added when at least a fifth of that map lies in those counties. Towns are the ones EPA lists and the Census places such a map covers, always inside those counties. In New England, where EPA's town names a whole Town, it is not matched to the village of the same name. A system is not listed in a county holding less than a fifth of its map, or in a county or town its map reaches when the map lies mostly outside the counties EPA lists, so a page can leave out a system that serves part of the area. Methodology and limitations