County drinking water records

St. Lucie County, FL drinking water systems

14 community water systems serve St. Lucie County, FL, reporting 320,433 people served in all.

8 of them (57%) had at least one health-based violation in the last 10 years. 14 systems still have one unresolved.

14 rely mainly on groundwater, counting water bought from other systems.

8 systems filed a lead service line inventory listing 126 lead lines, 92 galvanized lines that must be replaced and 25,759 lines of unknown material.

6 more systems are placed in St. Lucie County, FL by the county their records name because they have no service area map that lines up with their own records, so they are listed apart and not counted here.

Community water systems
14
People served, sum of each system's own figure
320,433
Systems with a health-based violation, last 10 years
8
Systems with one unresolved
14
Lead service lines in inventories
126

Water systems serving St. Lucie County

14 systems

People served is each system's own figure for its whole service area. Violation counts cover the last 10 years of EPA records.

System Serves People served Main source Health-based violations, 10 years Unresolved Lead lines
Port St Lucie Utilities Port St. Lucie, River Park and 1 more 224,485 Groundwater 0 1 0
Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority Fort Pierce, Hutchinson Island South and 5 more 58,000 Groundwater 0 1 126
St. Lucie West Services District Port St. Lucie 21,400 Groundwater 0 1 0
St Lucie County Util North County System Lakewood Park and Fort Pierce 5,073 Groundwater 0 4 0
Spanish Lakes Fairways Fort Pierce and land outside it 3,120 Groundwater 1 4 No inventory
Indian River Estates Fort Pierce South and Fort Pierce 2,365 Purchased groundwater 0 1 0
Spanish Lakes Country Club Village Lakewood Park and Fort Pierce 2,331 Groundwater 1 5 No inventory
Harbour Ridge Outside cities and towns 1,573 Groundwater 1 4 No inventory
Grove , the Indian River Estates and Fort Pierce and land outside them 1,125 Groundwater 1 4 No inventory
Meadowood Fort Pierce and land outside it 650 Groundwater 1 5 No inventory
Lake Manor MHP Outside cities and towns 100 Groundwater 4 3 0
Cypress MHP Lakewood Park and Fort Pierce 87 Groundwater 16 4 0
Bentonwood White City and Fort Pierce 80 Groundwater 0 1 0
H ; H MHP Lakewood Park and Fort Pierce 44 Groundwater 1 3 No inventory

Systems placed by county record in St. Lucie County

6 systems

EPA has no service area map for some of these systems, and the maps it has for the others do not line up with their own records. They are placed by the county their records name (the counties EPA lists them serving, or the county coded in their IDs where EPA lists none), and without a map they are not counted in the figures above.

System Serves People served Main source Health-based violations, 10 years Unresolved Lead lines
North Hutchinson Island County on record 3,954 Purchased groundwater 4 3 0
Nettles Island County on record 3,056 Purchased groundwater 1 5 No inventory
Country Cove Mobile Home Park County on record 197 Groundwater 1 8 No inventory
Indian River Landing County on record 130 Groundwater 1 7 No inventory
Sandalwood Estates S/D County on record 120 Groundwater 0 4 0
Colony Club MHP County on record 102 Groundwater 0 3 0

Cities and towns in St. Lucie County

10 places

Back to Florida

Counties come from the counties EPA lists each system serving, matched to 2024 Census counties; where EPA lists none, from the county coded in the system's ID, its service area map, or its mailing address. A county holding at least a fifth of a system's service area map is added when at least a fifth of that map lies in those counties. Towns are the ones EPA lists and the Census places such a map covers, always inside those counties. In New England, where EPA's town names a whole Town, it is not matched to the village of the same name. A system is not listed in a county holding less than a fifth of its map, or in a county or town its map reaches when the map lies mostly outside the counties EPA lists, so a page can leave out a system that serves part of the area. Methodology and limitations